Gay/Lesbian Survey, Nancy C. Unger

History 177

< Return to syllabus

Paper Requirements and Suggestions

This paper is an opportunity to indulge yourself in an in-depth look at virtually any aspect of gay and lesbian American history that appeals to you. You may conduct more conventional research—for example, a paper on a significant individual—or utilize the vast array of less conventional resources and/or less conventional topics available. You may focus on one particular historical period, or trace an idea or phenomenon across many periods within the century. If you are stuck for ideas, I am available for consultation and have a fairly extensive collection of G/L history sources in my office.

This is a HISTORY paper, not an analysis of current events! Therefore, the bulk of your paper should address HISTORICAL events occurring at least 10 years ago. There can be exceptions to this rule, however. See me if you have a particularly recent topic in mind. Bear in mind that you paper should utilize primary materials as extensively as possible. Ideally, you would all utilize the G/L archives in San Francisco, but considering the logistical problems as well as the limitations of a ten week quarter, I encourage you to consider the wealth of other primary sources more readily available.

Broad topics include the relationships between homosexuality and:

Still stuck for an idea? Consider the huge variety of primary source material available:

ALL of the above are only suggestions!! You by no means limited to this list!! Do check your ideas with me. I rarely refuse a project if a student is sincerely interested.

For additional ideas, do some browsing: Go to the Orradre home Web page and look at the “choose subject” menu on “research guides.” Click “Gender Studies” and you’ll find “Gay and Lesbian Studies—A Research Guide.” Or access it directly at http://www.scu.edu/orradre/research/gender_studies/gay-lesbian.html.

Also search in the database America: History and Life. Entering “homosexual,” “Lesbian,” or “gay men” will result in hundreds of scholarly articles. Browsing through the various entries allows you to get a sense of the vast amount of research being done on an incredible variety of topics. The bibliographies of the journal articles listed here are a gold mine of secondary and primary sources. Articles from the journals our library does not have will be delivered to you free of charge.

Do not submit the paper written for this class to another class for credit. If you have a similar assignment in another class and wish to work on a project that will fulfill the course requirements for both classes, please see me. If the other professor and I agree, your paper will need to be more in depth (around 15 pages of text). On the cover page, please note BOTH classes for which the paper has been submitted.

Select a topic that you will be able to adequately present in 8–10 pages of text with standard margins, exclusive of bibliography and footnotes. Keep in mind that this is a formal paper for an upper-division university course. I will provide you with samples of proper footnotes and bibliographic entries. Footnotes must be in proper format for a history paper. You may place them either at the bottom of each page (remembering to indent the first line of each entry) or as endnotes, but they cannot be placed parenthetically within the text. You may wish to consult The University of Chicago Press' A Manual of Style or Kate Turabian's A Manual for Writers, for questions concerning proper writing, footnoting, bibliographic entries, etc. Another helpful tool is Jules R. Benjamin's A Student's Guide to History.

Proper spelling and grammar are essential and will constitute 50% of your paper’s grade. When in doubt, consult Kate Turabian’s A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. DO NOT JUSTIFY THE RIGHT HAND MARGIN! Do NOT use contractions (“don’t,” “won’t,” etc., are not acceptable—write out “do not,” “would not,” etc.) After initially referring to a person by his or her full name (“Mary Beth Norton”) subsequent references should be last name only (“Norton”). DO NOT QUALIFY YOUR REMARKS WITH THE USE OF “I.” Contrast the two following sentences: “I think lesbians gained important rights through this crucial legislation.” “Lesbians gained important rights through this crucial legislation.” Clearly the second statement is the more forceful and compelling one. Besides, the whole paper is what you think, so there is no need to be redundant.

Please do not enclose your paper in a binder or file. A staple will do.

When printing your paper, always run the spell checker. Each page of your paper must be numbered. Your paper must have a title. Titles are important—they tell the reader what the paper is about and should intrigue the reader. Dates should appear day first, then month, followed by year—with no commas in between: The battle began 12 May 1865, and did not end for many months.

The bibliography should include not just the works cited within the paper, but ALL the works consulted.

Use quotations sparingly. The focus of the paper should be your interpretation of the evidence, not the evidence itself. Long quotes, if used at all, must be indented and single spaced. Unless the exact wording of the source is crucial, paraphrase rather than quote—but always remember to footnote what you paraphrase. The period at the end of a quote appears inside the quotation marks: The Grand Canyon was “the greatest home the Indians ever knew.”1

Begin your paper by putting it into historiographic context. What has been said on this topic before, and by whom? (“The leading books on this subject are John Smith’s Gay Men in Drag (1995), and Joan Johnson’s Drag Queens in History (1974).” What are you saying that is new, or that substantially adds to what has already been said? (“Both Johnson and Smith focus almost exclusively on gay men in drag. This paper will focus primarily on the negative response this generated among feminists,” or, “While Johnson focuses on the emotional needs of men in drag and Smith on the changes in the legal repercussions of appearing publicly in drag, this paper will synthesize their two topics, revealing how one can be used to inform the other.”) Thus, your paper cannot be just a rehash or report on something already well known. You should be learning something new. This is a research paper, not a report!

Your written research proposal, including topic, tentative thesis, and working bibliography, is due no later than is listed on your syllabus, but the sooner the better. A working bibliography includes not only the sources you have in hand, but the sources you intend to consult. Required: In addition to listing all secondary sources (including at least two journal articles), specifically identify your primary sources.

Research papers turned in early will be evaluated and returned. Revised papers may be resubmitted for a higher grade. Such revisions are entirely optional. The sooner you can get a draft to me, the better. The last day to turn in a draft for revision is listed on your syllabus. The last day papers, including revised drafts, will be accepted is also listed on your syllabus. No papers will be accepted after that date. This quarter will FLY by, so map out your research agenda NOW!

Proper Footnotes and Bibliography

Considering the variety of styles used across the disciplines, there is a great deal of understandable confusion about the appropriate style for footnotes and bibliographic entries. Papers for this class are to follow the model set forth in Kate L. Turabian’s A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations.

1. BOOK

Author: John Hope Franklin. Title: The Biography of George Washington Williams. Place of publication: Chicago. Publisher: University of Chicago Press. Copyright date: 1985. Page number: 54.

FOOTNOTE

1. John Hope Franklin, The Biography of George Washington Williams (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), 54.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC ENTRY

Franklin, John Hope. The Biography of George Washington Williams. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.

2. JOURNAL ARTICLE

Author: Nancy C. Unger. Article title: “The ’Political Suicide’ of Robert M. La Follette: Public Disaster, Private Catharsis. ” Journal: The Psychohistory Review. Volume: 21. Number: 3. Date: Winter 1993. Pages: 197–220. Page quoted: 213.

FOOTNOTE

2. Nancy C. Unger, “The ’Political Suicide’ of Robert M. La Follette: Public Disaster, Private Catharsis, ” The Psychohistory Review 21 (Winter 1993): 213.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC ENTRY

Unger, Nancy C. “The ’Political Suicide’ of Robert M. La Follette: Public Disaster, Private Catharsis. ” The Psychohistory Review 21 (Winter 1993): 197–220.

3. NEWSPAPER ARTICLES

Author: Tyler Marshall. Article Title: World War II Remembered. Newspaper: New York Times. Date: January 15, 1995. Section Number/Letter: B. Page Number: 7. Edition (morning or evening): M.

FOOTNOTE

3. Tyler Marshall, “World War II Remembered, ” New York Times, 15 January 1995, B7(M).

BIBLIOGRAPHIC ENTRY

Marshall, Tyler. “World War II Remembered. ” New York Times, 15 January 1995, B7(M).

4. CITATION TAKEN FROM A SECONDARY SOURCE

Author you’re citing: Helen Hunt Jackson. Article Title: The Evolution of White Women’s Experience in Early America. Journal: American Historical Review. Volume: 14. Date: June 1984. Page number in that journal: 597. Author of Secondary Source: Mary Beth Norton. Title: Major Problems in American Women’s History. Place of Publication: Lexington, Massachusetts. Publisher D.C. Heath and Company. Date: 1989. Page: 43.

FOOTNOTE

4. Helen Hunt Jackson, “The Evolution of White Women’s Experience in Early America, ” American Historical Review 14 (June 1984): 597, quoted in Mary Beth Norton, ed., Major Problems in American Women’s History (Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company, 1989), 43.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC ENTRY

Jackson, Helen Hunt. “The Evolution of White Women’s Experience in Early America. ”

American Historical Review 14 (June 1984): 590–598. Quoted in Mary Beth Norton, ed. Major Problems in American Women’s History, 42–47. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company, 1989.

5. WORLD WIDE WEB

document. Author’s name: Joe Smith. Title of document: Eldrige Cleaver Title of Website: The Black Panther Homepage. Date of publication or most recent revision: May 13, 1999. URL: www.blackpanthers/blackhistory.htm. Date of access: September 23, 2001.

FOOTNOTE

1[1]. Joe Smith, “Eldridge Cleaver,” The Black Panther Homepage, 13 May 1999, <http:www.blackpanters/blackhistory.htm> (23 Sep. 2001).

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Smith, Joe. “Eldridge Cleaver.” The Black Panther Homepage 13 May 1999.<http:www.blackpanters/blackhistory.htm> (23 Sep. 2001).

6. FROM AN ELECTRONIC VERSION OF A NEWSPAPER

newspaper article found on Web. Author’s name: Chris Wren. Title of article: “A Body on Everest.” Newspaper: Bohunk News. Date of article: 22 July 1956. URL: bn.com/search/daily/bin/getdoc+site+332534+0. Date of access: October 31, 2001.

FOOTNOTE

[1]2. Chris Wren, “A Body on Everest,” Bohunk News online, 22 July 1956, <http:www.bn.com/search/daily/bin/getdoc+site+332534+0> (31 Oct. 2001).

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Wren, Chris. “A Body on Everest.” Bohunk News online, 22 July 1956. <http:www.bn.com/search/daily/bin/getdoc+site+332534+0> (31 Oct. 2001).

IF YOU ARE USING THE NEW YORK TIMES on the web through SCU’s Orradre Library cite, or any other source that requires a subscription, there’s no need to put the whole online address. Simply follow the date of the story/article with New York Times, Proquest Historical Newspapers Online.

If you cite a source more than once in your footnotes, the first time, you put the full citation:

5. John Hope Franklin, The Biography of George Washington Williams (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), 54.

If you use that exact same page as your next footnote:

6. Ibid.

If you use the same book, but a different page as your next footnote:

7. Ibid., 32.

If you use that same book, but there are several other footnotes in between, use an abbreviated citation:

10. Franklin, Williams, 54.

When in doubt, consult Turabian!

Working Theses for History 177—Spring 2002

You do NOT have to hand this in, but mentally review this checklist before handing in your research paper: